Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
The LIF is generally in favour of harmonising and streamlining the SPC application process, but Lif has identified several uncertainties and concerns that need to be addressed, see Annex. Essentially, the possibility of pre grant opposition procedure for a third party should be excluded from the proposal. Furthermore, procedural aspects and timelines should be clarified.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
The LIF is generally in favour of harmonising and streamlining the SPC application process, but Lif has identified several uncertainties and concerns that need to be addressed, see Annex. Essentially, the possibility of pre grant opposition procedure for a third party should be excluded from the proposal. Furthermore, procedural aspects and timelines should be clarified.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Lif next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Lif’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.