Thank you for the well prepared material. We agree to the reply, but have 3 comments: - Regarding the ranking. We suggest that Innovation and Environment is tared 2 and 3 and Social responsibility as 4: We have also a few proposals for implementation that could be added to the reply: Introduce a Made in EU label for procurement tenders, signaling preference for EU-origin products.
KS
Kamstrup A/S
Company · Denmark
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Kamstrup in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Kamstrup A/S? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Kamstrup A/S filed 3 positions between 16 Apr 2025 and 13 Apr 2026, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2025 · 2 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the Draft Commission Guidance on the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). As a leading European provider of intelligent metering solutions, Kamstrup welcomes the Commissions efforts to bring clarity to the implementation of the CRA and to support a harmonised, secure, and futureproof digital product landscape across the EU.
Kamstrup thanks the commission for the opportunity to have insights and comment on the draft implementing act defining the technical descriptions of important and critical product categories under the CRA. We appreciate the possibility to provide constructive comments for specific categories where we have some expertise and that may affect our business. Please find our feedback in the attachment.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Kamstrup A/S next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 28.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Kamstrup A/S’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.