not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 692 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 692 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 692 consultation files tracked so far (61,195 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish. Free with a PolicySpeak website account.
Work at Graz University of Technology? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Graz University of Technology filed 2 positions between 18 Jul 2025 and 30 Jul 2026, across 2 of the 692 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
Statement by Graz University of Technology and Austrian Society for Biomedical Engineering (OeGMBT) concerning the Commission’s Proposal COM(2025) 1023-final, amending, amongst others, Regulations 2017/745 (MDR) and 2017/746 (IV-MDR), reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices Graz University of Technology appreciates the efforts being made by the EU-Commission in its proposal to simplify and reduce the…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
We strongly support the revision of the Roadworthiness Package to implement additional emission reduction strategies in PTI and for roadside emission measurement. Based on our experience, we would like to highlight the following aspects that should be considered for the implementation: - Given that gasoline vehicles will account for the majority of combustion-based vehicles in the coming decades, we highly recommend…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Graz University of Technology next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Graz University of Technology’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
