GoodFuels welcomes the proposal for an amended Renewable Energy Directive, which in combination with the other proposals provide a sound mix of regulatory measures on the path to climate neutrality by 2050. The inclusion of dedicated targets for the shipping and aviation sector is received with enthusiasm.
GOO
GoodFuels
Company · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 944161025531-96not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 15 Oct 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
6
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track GoodFuels in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at GoodFuels? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
GoodFuels filed 6 positions between 8 Nov 2021 and 18 Nov 2021, across 6 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.
What they argued
FinCo Fuel Group and GoodFuels welcome the revision of the Emission Trading System (ETS) as part of the Fit for 55 Package. With the inclusion of the road and maritime sector we believe an important step will be taken to advance further CO2-emission reductions and to reach European climate goals.
FinCo Fuel Group and GoodFuels welcome the revision of the European Tax Directive (ETD) as part of the Fit for 55 Package. We support the proposed adaptations which ensure excises structures will stimulate the use of sustainable low carbon energy. In order to achieve this, certain amendments to the current proposal are however needed to propel the transition from fossil fuels to sustainable renewable alternatives.
We, GoodFuels, appreciate the EU’s efforts in leading the energy transition and tackling GHG emissions in the maritime sector. Given the cross-border nature of this sector, it is the right approach to address its GHG impact on EU level and thereby set an example for the international shipping sector to follow. An important aspect of reducing GHG emissions is the availability of alternative fuels.
GoodFuels position on ReFuelEU Aviation. We appreciate the EU’s efforts in leading the energy transition and, besides road transport, now also tackling GHG emissions in both the maritime and aviation sector. Given the cross-border nature of those sectors, it is the right approach to address its GHG impact on EU level and thereby set an example for the international maritime and aviation industry.
We appreciate the European Union’s efforts in leading the energy transition and tackling GHG emissions in the maritime sector. Given the cross-border nature of shipping, it is the right approach to address its GHG impact on a Union level and thereby set an example for the international shipping community to follow.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put GoodFuels next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 299.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from GoodFuels’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.