Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
GE

GEIE ERCIM

Academic / research · France · EU Transparency Register 477826925616-49

1
position filed
in the 583 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 583 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 964 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #788 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • ERCIM is the partner of W3C for Europe (The W3C standardisation organisation is incorporated in the US, but has partn…

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).

Register category
Non-governmental organisations
Registered as
European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM)
Head office
Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track GEIE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at GEIE ERCIM? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file GEIE ERCIM engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from GEIE ERCIM or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

GEIE ERCIM filed 1 position on 22 Jan 2021, across 1 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

European data governance (Data Governance Act)filed 22 Jan 2021PDFsource

The W3C Linked data framework can be instrumental to implement the vision set out in European strategy for data. In order to do this, the legal value of metadata – in the sense of data annotations – needs to be clarified to ease the creation of data value chains considerably. This document makes a suggestion on how to encode the needed legal certainty requirement into the act.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put GEIE ERCIM next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from GEIE ERCIM’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.