Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 586 consultation files tracked so far (42,822 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
As a member of the Federation of Associations of Professional Illustrators (FADIP), and a worker in the European cultural sector, I oppose this initiative for the following reasons: 1- generative AI, in its current form, requires the mass looting of cultural material without permission or remuneration for the training of its models.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
As a member of the Federation of Associations of Professional Enlighteners (FADIP), and a worker in the European cultural sector, I oppose this initiative for the following reasons: 1. Generative AI, in its current form, requires the mass looting of cultural material without permission or remuneration for the training of its models.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put FADIP next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from FADIP’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.