Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
EPH

EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft.

Company · Hungary

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track EVE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft.? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft. engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft. or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft. filed 3 positions on 27 May 2024, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.

What they argued

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 27 May 2024PDFsource

8. For Article 2.4, it is recommended that the electricity modelling should add the way of recognizing the national renewable energy-green electricity certificate and the national/regional grid carbon footprint factor. Article 2.4&2.4.1 refers to The carbon footprint of the consumption of electricity shall be that of the national average electricity consumption mix.

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 27 May 2024PDFsource

4. For Article 2.2.1 (d) End-of-life and recycling, subpoint (b) battery dismantling and the dismantling of battery and its components in the last subparagraph, please explain the difference between battery dismantling in these two phrases and which part of the dismantling is part of the life cycle and is required to calculate the carbon footprint impact.

Carbon footprint methodology for electric vehicle batteriesfiled 27 May 2024PDFsource

1. For Article 2.1 (b), it is recommended to clarify the basis for the typical number of full equivalent charge-discharge cycles per year in the Etotal calculation formula. Otherwise, the industry or national standards of the battery manufacturer's location should be acknowledged or measurement standards should be provided, allowing the manufacturer to calculate and provide data that aligns with the actual…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from EVE POWER HUNGARY KFT. Kft.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.