Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 37854527418-86
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
4
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 410 trade unions and professional associations on this site, they rank #155 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€200K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2011
in the register since
Declares membership of
ecoDa is a member of the Global Network of Directors' Institutes (GNDI)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
Register category
Trade unions and professional associations
Registered as
European Confederation of Directors' Associations (ecoDa)
Head office
Bruxelles, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
ecoDa filed 4 positions between 26 Feb 2020 and 3 Jun 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 4 times.
1 DG FISMA – Corporate Reporting, Audit & Credit Rating Agencies Sven Gentner, Head of Unit Cc: Petr Wagner, Deputy Head of Unit 3 June 2026 Subject: ecoDa response to the open feedback on the final revised ESRS Dear Mr Gentner, The European Confederation of Director Associations (ecoDa) welcomes the revised ESRS framework as an important step towards simplifying sustainability reporting requirements for companies…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Given that the EC Impact Assessment on Sustainable CG is largely based on the EY related survey, ecoDa will largely focus its comments on this report. ecoDa strongly believes in the importance for companies and directors to strengthen their long-term strategies by further integrating the interests of legitimate stakeholders that make sense to their business.
20 February 2020 ecoDa’s Reaction to the DG Fisma’s Inception Impact Assessment on the Non-Financial Reporting Directive DG FISMA has published an Inception Impact Assessment on the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and has left it for comments by February the 27th.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
ecoDa is concerned about the ability of European companies targeted by the CSRD to meet all the legal requirements that will be imposed on them in an excessively short period of time. However, groups well advanced in sustainability reporting have indeed expressed a view that the overall implementation of the CSRD will benefit from early access to sector-specific standards so that the full scope of required…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ecoDa next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from ecoDa’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
