Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Company · Poland
Industry association · Italy
Declared costs: €1.8M+ a year · in the register since 2013
Amending certain Regulations as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union · Amendments to the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR)
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Warsaw Stock Exchange · filed 20 Mar 2026 · source
WSE welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Market Integration and Supervision Package (MISP), recognising its potential to strengthen integration, competitiveness, and efficiency of the Single Market. At the same time, EU reforms must maintain the balance between deeper integration and a well functioning trading environment.
Italian Banking Association · filed 20 Mar 2026 · source
We appreciate the opportunity to share our members views on the European Commissions Proposal for the MISP Regulation. Given the broad scope and variety of topics addressed, we have prepared the attached position paper commenting in detail the MISP Regulations proposal.
Warsaw Stock Exchange · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source
Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE) appreciates the opportunity to give feedback on the review of the MiFID II/MiFIR framework. WSE shares the objectives of the MiFIR review proposal to increase transparency and liquidity within the EU, to enhance the level-playing field between execution venues, and to foster the competitiveness of capital markets.
Italian Banking Association · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source
We support the wide scope of financial instruments subject to consolidation but we do not favour the multiple-CTPs model (a CTP per Asset Class). In our view a single, public and institutional CTP would be more efficient for the final users in terms of number of data sources and overall cost for accessing consolidated data. As for the governance of CTPs, the Proposal foresees competitive privately-owned operators.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.