Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
EFP
EFPIA

Industry association · Belgium

35
files engaged
of 583 tracked
49
positions filed
in those 583 files
13.4
declared FTE
self-declared
13
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €6M+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (3)

Medicinal products for human use · Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations · Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products. Recast

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Medicinal products for human use

EFPIA · filed 27 Apr 2021 · source

EFPIA supports an agile regulatory framework and a strong incentives’ system that embrace and encourage advances in science, technology & medicines. This evaluation is an opportunity to implement learnings from COVID-19 and ensure a competitive, world-class regulatory system in Europe supporting a globally competitive research-based industry at a critical time.

EFPIA · filed 3 Oct 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.

EFPIA · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) · filed 8 Nov 2023 · source

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and its member companies join the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations in raising significant concerns with a number of the proposed revisions to Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation EC 726/2004.

Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations

EFPIA · filed 28 Apr 2022 · source

The substantial investment in R&D by multiple actors over many years into novel technologies, vaccine, therapeutic and other products now available to address Covid-19 would not have occurred without the robust IP system in the EU and elsewhere. IP protections, particularly patents, has provided the legal framework and incentive for the high risk, high-cost investment underpinning the response to the pandemic.

EFPIA · filed 28 Jul 2023 · source

In its Compulsory Licensing (CL) proposal, the European Commission (EC) posits a new EU-wide CL for crisis response. This harms IP rights and is a dramatic expansion of the ECs role into Member State (MS) remit, where viable CL provisions already exist. CLs are a last resort, all attempts at voluntary licensing having failed.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) · filed 31 Jul 2023 · source

PhRMA has serious concerns with the ECs proposed regulation to establish a pan-EU compulsory licensing (CL) mechanism for crisis management. Although most respondents during the consultation process supported a coordinating role only for the EU institutions related to CLs, the proposed regulation goes significantly further.

Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products. Recast

EFPIA · filed 30 Mar 2022 · source

Bringing new therapies to patients is a long, complex and risky process that requires long-term and continuous investments. Patents are critical to that purpose and to the EU’s innovation and industrial ambitions.

EFPIA · filed 15 Sept 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.

EFPIA · filed 15 Sept 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) · filed 20 Sept 2023 · source

PhRMA joins EFPIA in raising significant concerns with the European Commissions (ECs) proposal to establish a new mechanism for parties to oppose the grant of SPCs. While PhRMA supports the general intent of the proposed recast of the SPC Regulation to establish a centralized process for seeking SPCs in the EU without altering the substance of that protection, the proposed procedure includes redundant and…

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.