Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
We would like to thank us for the possibility of presenting our perspective on the clean burning of wood. The producers of dust separators organised in the CEA are in principle in favour of clean stack and caching stoves in order to protect health and the environment. Wood-based heat has advantages that otherwise do not satisfy any energy source.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
SER (French renewable energy trade association) would like to submit the following inputs : Seasonal energy efficiency (ɳs) needs a new calculation method. In that, SER support the working document supplied by the Technical Committee 295 of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) that take into account partial load output, and the renewable aspect of the wood.
The deployment of acceleration areas should be encouraged in terms of political intent for renewable energy. They make it possible to increase the acceptability of future projects by involving the population in consultation as soon as possible.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
We would hereby like to support the message delivered via Solar Heat Europe (see attached document) concerning the fact that renewable heating and solar thermal are often ignored in European and national legislation.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.
