Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Company · RUS
Other · Austria
Declared costs: €2.8M+ a year · in the register since 2010
Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive) · Digital labelling of EU fertilising products
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 28 Aug 2020 · source
• In general: EU framework for methodology on PEF and OEF on voluntary basis in a harmonised matter may be useful – mandatory system not first choice, different P(O)EFCRs in Member States to be avoided – therefore WKO proposing to consider option 1 (update of PEFs and OEFs) or 2 (voluntary legal framework), currently not option 3 (legal framework establishing obligation for claims by PEF/OEF) because of costs and…
PJSC Phosagro · filed 24 May 2023 · source
PhosAgro is the leading producer of environmentally safe phosphate fertilisers. We welcome the occasion to submit our feedback on the initiative aimed at introducing minimum requirements for substantiating and communicating of explicit environmental claims. We appreciate every effort to supply consumers with reliable, verified and exact information.
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 5 Jul 2023 · source
WKO Position Paper Short Summary - Proposal for a Green Claims Directive: less restrictions for the benefit of consumer orientation more exemptions and support for SMEs, implementation leeway needed substantiation to be simplified radically verification and authority-OK to be deleted national, regional and private labels to be exempted from verification in any case.
Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 3 Sept 2021 · source
— Simplification of the label is absolutely necessary, as information on chemical labels is currently overcrowded. Information on the label shall be limited to the most essential information (e.g. CLP marking). Other information (e.g. additional label elements due to specific rules) should be made available digitally.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
PJSC Phosagro · filed 23 May 2023 · source
PhosAgro is the leading producer of environmentally safe phosphate fertilisers. We welcome the occasion to provide feedback on a proposal for a regulation on the digital labelling of fertilising products. We support the initiative to modify the EU Fertilising Products Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 so as to introduce new labelling requirements to create a voluntary digital label in annex III.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.