Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

PRM
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America

Industry association · United States

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
EFP
EFPIA

Industry association · Belgium

35
files engaged
of 583 tracked
49
positions filed
in those 583 files
13.4
declared FTE
self-declared
13
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €6M+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations · Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products. Recast

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations

EFPIA · filed 28 Apr 2022 · source

The substantial investment in R&D by multiple actors over many years into novel technologies, vaccine, therapeutic and other products now available to address Covid-19 would not have occurred without the robust IP system in the EU and elsewhere. IP protections, particularly patents, has provided the legal framework and incentive for the high risk, high-cost investment underpinning the response to the pandemic.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · filed 29 Apr 2022 · source

PhRMA, and the innovative biopharmaceutical companies that it represents, has serious concerns with the call for legislative action regarding compulsory licensing in the EU and its Member States. While the call for evidence recognizes that compulsory licensing should be a tool of last resort, it suggests that there is a need for a central compulsory licensing mechanism in Europe for use in a potential crisis.

EFPIA · filed 28 Jul 2023 · source

In its Compulsory Licensing (CL) proposal, the European Commission (EC) posits a new EU-wide CL for crisis response. This harms IP rights and is a dramatic expansion of the ECs role into Member State (MS) remit, where viable CL provisions already exist. CLs are a last resort, all attempts at voluntary licensing having failed.

Supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products. Recast

EFPIA · filed 30 Mar 2022 · source

Bringing new therapies to patients is a long, complex and risky process that requires long-term and continuous investments. Patents are critical to that purpose and to the EU’s innovation and industrial ambitions.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · filed 5 Apr 2022 · source

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the innovative biopharmaceuticals companies that they represent, commend the European Commission’s call for the development of a single procedure for the granting of supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe.

EFPIA · filed 15 Sept 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.

EFPIA · filed 15 Sept 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.