Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The substantial investment in R&D by multiple actors over many years into novel technologies, vaccine, therapeutic and other products now available to address Covid-19 would not have occurred without the robust IP system in the EU and elsewhere. IP protections, particularly patents, has provided the legal framework and incentive for the high risk, high-cost investment underpinning the response to the pandemic.
PhRMA, and the innovative biopharmaceutical companies that it represents, has serious concerns with the call for legislative action regarding compulsory licensing in the EU and its Member States. While the call for evidence recognizes that compulsory licensing should be a tool of last resort, it suggests that there is a need for a central compulsory licensing mechanism in Europe for use in a potential crisis.
In its Compulsory Licensing (CL) proposal, the European Commission (EC) posits a new EU-wide CL for crisis response. This harms IP rights and is a dramatic expansion of the ECs role into Member State (MS) remit, where viable CL provisions already exist. CLs are a last resort, all attempts at voluntary licensing having failed.
Bringing new therapies to patients is a long, complex and risky process that requires long-term and continuous investments. Patents are critical to that purpose and to the EU’s innovation and industrial ambitions.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the innovative biopharmaceuticals companies that they represent, commend the European Commission’s call for the development of a single procedure for the granting of supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Europe.
EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.
EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.