Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

OCL
Oxera Consulting LLP

Company · United Kingdom

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
TS
Telefonica, S.A.

Company · Spain

14
files engaged
of 583 tracked
16
positions filed
in those 583 files
5.5
declared FTE
self-declared
6
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2M+ a year · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (2)

Digital Markets Act · Guidelines on exclusionary abuses of dominance

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Digital Markets Act

Oxera Consulting LLP · filed 30 Jun 2020 · source

Oxera is pleased to provide feedback on the Commission’s initiative for an Ex Ante regulatory framework for online platforms. In the interests of transparency, we would like to state that we are currently advising several technology firms and an industry body on issues around the Digital Services Act. The feedback and opinions provided here are entirely our own.

Telefonica, S.A. · filed 29 Apr 2021 · source

TELEFONICA’S POSITION ON THE COMMISSION’S DIGITAL MARKETS ACT (DMA) PROPOSAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Telefónica endorses the objective to promote fair and contestable markets by regulating the activities of platform service providers with significant impact on the Internal Market. We believe that there are a number of ways the effectiveness of the proposal could be improved.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Guidelines on exclusionary abuses of dominance

Oxera Consulting LLP · filed 24 Apr 2023 · source

Oxera welcomes the call for evidence and comments by the European Commission (Commission) regarding future guidelines for the application of Article 102 TFEU, and the insights provided in the Briefing Paper that accompanies the Communication on the amendments of the 2008 Guidance Paper.

Telefonica, S.A. · filed 24 Apr 2023 · source

Telefónica welcomes the Commissions call for evidence ahead of the adoption of the Guidelines on exclusionary abuses of dominance. Please find Telefónica's response to the call for evidence on the attached file. Our response is mainly related to the Commissions amendments to the Guidance on the enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.