Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ME
MD-EX

Other · France

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
MPP
Medtech & Pharma Platform Association

Industry association · Switzerland

5
files engaged
of 583 tracked
7
positions filed
in those 583 files
0.8
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €200K+ a year · in the register since 2018

Files both filed on (2)

Transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices · Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodies

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

MD-EX · filed 13 Jan 2023 · source

Dear, First I want to thank you to permit to give our feedback. Below some questions/ comments : - Harmonization for qualification of product reviewer and recognition at European Level RDM 2017/745 Annex VII §3.2.5 Criteria for qualification of product reviewer is not sufficiently detailed in RDM 2017/745 and subject to the interpretation and not harmonization between NB regarding qualification.

Medtech & Pharma Platform Association · filed 18 Jan 2023 · source

The Medtech & Pharma Platform Association (MPP) is writing to you to share its views on the European Commissions proposal regarding the transition periods of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR). Overall, the MPP supports and welcomes the proposal, which is crucial to ensure the continued supply of products to patients.

Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodies

MD-EX · filed 21 Jan 2026 · source

I fully share the objective of this revision. It is indeed essential to adapt the regulatory framework in order to enable companies, particularly SMEs, to cope with requirements that can sometimes be disproportionate, with unpredictable timelines and an administrative burden that has become difficult to sustain.

Medtech & Pharma Platform Association · filed 23 Jan 2026 · source

The Medtech & Pharma Platform Association (MPP) welcomes the proposed EU Implementing Regulation establishing harmonised quality management and procedural requirements for conformity assessment activities performed by notified bodies. We consider the introduction of requirements for reliable quotations, predictable timelines, and transparent monitoring of both timelines and costs to be a positive step.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.