Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ME
MD-EX

Other · France

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Files both filed on (2)

Transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices · Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodies

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices

MD-EX · filed 13 Jan 2023 · source

Dear, First I want to thank you to permit to give our feedback. Below some questions/ comments : - Harmonization for qualification of product reviewer and recognition at European Level RDM 2017/745 Annex VII §3.2.5 Criteria for qualification of product reviewer is not sufficiently detailed in RDM 2017/745 and subject to the interpretation and not harmonization between NB regarding qualification.

EuromContact · filed 18 Jan 2023 · source

EuromContact agrees with the initial postulate of the proposal : many devices which may be placed on the market in accordance with the initial MDR transitional provisions are not going to be certified in accordance with that Regulation before the end of the transition period, which leads to a major risk of shortages of medical devices in the EU.

Implementing rules regarding requirements to be met by notified bodies

MD-EX · filed 21 Jan 2026 · source

I fully share the objective of this revision. It is indeed essential to adapt the regulatory framework in order to enable companies, particularly SMEs, to cope with requirements that can sometimes be disproportionate, with unpredictable timelines and an administrative burden that has become difficult to sustain.

EuromContact · filed 23 Jan 2026 · source

EuromContact, the European association representing manufacturers of contact lenses and lens care products, welcomes this consultation and agrees with the assessment that MDR implementation has shown inconsistent and divergent interpretations of certain requirements set out in MDR Annex VII, especially as regards the timelines for completing conformity assessment activities and re-certification.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.