Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

LS
LIF Sweden

Industry association · Sweden

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
ME
Medicines for Europe

Industry association · Belgium

15
files engaged
of 583 tracked
22
positions filed
in those 583 files
7.9
declared FTE
self-declared
10
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €500K+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Medicinal products for human use · Fees and charges payable to the European Medicines Agency

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Medicinal products for human use

Medicines for Europe · filed 22 Apr 2021 · source

Medicines for Europe represents manufacturers of off-patent medicines supplying close to 70% of dispensed prescription medicines in Europe. The pharmaceutical legislation should foster access to follow-on off-patent medicines on day-1 after IP expiry by extending the scope and harmonising the Bolar exemption to cover API supply and all administrative steps needed to effectively launch generic/biosimilar medicines.

Medicines for Europe · filed 29 Sept 2023 · source

Medicines for Europe, representing manufacturers of generic, biosimilar and value added medicines across Europe, welcomes the proposals to review the EU general pharmaceutical legislation. As the off-patent sector accounting for 70% of medicines dispensed in Europe covering 80% of therapeutic areas, we fully share the goals of ensuring that all patients across the EU have timely and equitable access to safe…

Medicines for Europe · filed 29 Sept 2023 · source

Medicines for Europe, representing manufacturers of generic, biosimilar and value added medicines across Europe, welcomes the proposals to review the EU general pharmaceutical legislation. As the off-patent sector accounting for 70% of medicines dispensed in Europe across 80% of therapeutic areas, we fully share the goals of ensuring that all patients in the EU have timely and equitable access to safe, effective and…

LIF Sweden · filed 2 Nov 2023 · source

The LIF welcomes the Commission’s initiative for a modernised regulatory framework for medicines that can be more easily adapted to technological and medical developments. The LIF considers that the Commission’s objective of creating more equal access to new medicines between EU Member States is important. On the other hand, the proposal contains several elements to which Lif has strong objections.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

LIF Sweden · filed 2 Nov 2023 · source

Replies to the EU Commission deadline 7 November 2023 Lif welcomes the Commission’s initiative for a modernised regulatory framework for medicines that can be more easily adapted to technological and medical developments. The LIF considers that the Commission’s objective of creating more equal access to new medicines between EU Member States is important.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Fees and charges payable to the European Medicines Agency

Medicines for Europe · filed 16 Oct 2019 · source

Medicines for Europe welcomes an opportunity to comment on the concept of the EMA fees revision. Despite the fact that the current EMA fee system is complex due to many different categories and types of fees, the feedback from the Medicines for Europe’s membership is that EMA fees system is not that difficult to apply it and it is quite predictable.

LIF Sweden · filed 3 Feb 2023 · source

Lif Sweden is the trade association for the research-based pharmaceutical industry in Sweden. Lif welcomes the opportunity to comment on the EU Commissions EMA fees proposal. The up-coming revision of the EU regulatory system is an opportunity to make the system faster, more efficient and flexible and thereby strengthen EU global competitiveness.

Medicines for Europe · filed 7 Feb 2023 · source

Medicines for Europes comments of the EMA fees regulation. Medicines for Europe supports a cost-based EMA fee system with a simpler fee structure. For generic medicines with very low margins, regulatory costs can be critical to maintain older products (with low to zero profitability) or supply products to small markets.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.