Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The ETS should remain a core policy instrument to establish CO2 abatement at the lowest practicable cost to society. We do not favor inclusion of other sectors such as transport and buildings as an extension of the ETS current scheme, which already has to cope with different sectors with distinct elasticities, and risks on carbon leakage in one system.
LanzaTech commends the European Commission’s ambition in its revision of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). We welcome the opportunity to respond to the EU Commission’s proposal, and we look forward to working alongside the co-legislators going forward. The following outlines our feedback and recommendations on some of the specific policy mechanisms put forth in the EU Commission’s proposal.
Revision of Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (Energy Taxation Directive or ‘ETD’ or ‘Directive’) Cefic comments 1. Managing the different global speeds.
LanzaTech commends the European Commission’s ambition in its revision of the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD). We welcome the opportunity to respond to the EU Commission’s proposal, and we look forward to working alongside the co-legislators going forward.
We support the EU-SAF Blending Mandate with recommendations: a) Should come into force after min. of 3 years to enable implementation of commercial SAF projects and to allow airlines, airports, and other stakeholders time to prepare. b) To be effective, the cost of non-compliance should exceed and possibly be tied to the cost differential between SAF and conventional fuels.
LanzaTech commends the European Commission for its consideration of policies in support of aviation greenhouse gas reductions and increased supply and offtake of sustainable aviation fuels in the EU. We welcome the opportunity to respond to the EU Commission’s proposal, and we look forward to working alongside the co-legislators going forward.
APAG welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the ReFuelEU Aviation Regulation. We are pleased by the horizontal alignment with the Renewable Energy Directive (RED II) on sustainable transport fuels and the choice of a Regulation over a Directive. We are delighted that the European Commission’s proposal aims at promoting truly sustainable biofuels for aviation.
LanzaTech commends the European Commission for its proposal to boost the uptake of sustainable fuels in shipping and ports to reduce emissions from the sector. We welcome the opportunity to respond to the EU Commission's proposal and working alongside the co-legislators in the future.
•The European Oleochemicals & Allied Products Group (APAG) welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the FuelEU Maritime Regulation. As we fully support the European Union’s intention to reduce emissions from shipping and would support a more ambitious approach on biofuels, modeled after the Renewable Energy Directive, including: 1.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.