Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
77
files engaged
of 583 tracked
87
positions filed
in those 583 files
15
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2.8M+ a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (3)

Medicinal products for human use · Fluorinated gases regulation · Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Medicinal products for human use

German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA) · filed 27 Apr 2021 · source

The German Environment Agency (UBA) welcomes the opportunity given by the European Commission to comment on the inception impact assessment regarding the evaluation and revision of the general pharmaceutical legislation as part of the realisation of the Pharmaceutical Strategy.

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 8 Nov 2023 · source

The Austrian Economic Chamber welcomes in principle the European Commission’s objectives under the Pharmaceutical Strategy and sees them as an opportunity to strengthen the pharmaceutical base in Austria and Europe.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Fluorinated gases regulation

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 3 Sept 2020 · source

As early as 2017, it became clear that the availability of the main F-gases in the internal market will be limited. Prices were exploded and supply could no longer be guaranteed for many applications. Only between March and October 2017 did the prices of common refrigerants in Central Europe increase by ~750 %. This trend continued until 2018 and then stabilised.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA) · filed 7 Sept 2020 · source

German Environment Agency (UBA) response to the combined evaluation roadmap/Inception Impact Assessment for the Review of EU rules on fluorinated greenhouse gases (Ares(2020)3402178 - 29/06/2020) UBA welcomes the review of the F-gas Regulation and the intent to improve actions to avoid emissions of fluorinated greenhouse gases.

Re-attribution of scientific and technical tasks and improving cooperation among Union agencies in the area of chemicals

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 7 Apr 2022 · source

Streamlining and optimising public administration structures is always a useful approach. Particularly in the area of chemicals legislation, it is very good to do so. We fully agree on the need to use existing resources more efficiently. Optimising cooperation between EU and national authorities is crucial for savings. Synergies and overlaps need to be clearly identified.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt, UBA) · filed 12 Apr 2022 · source

UBA appreciates the initiative of streamlining the technical and scientific work through EU agencies by an omnibus regulation. Environmental safety data already assessed by one of the European agencies should be available for procedures under different EU regulations. This should also apply to environmental data from the veterinary and human pharmaceutical legislation.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.