Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Public authority · France
Declared costs: €25K+ a year · in the register since 2018
Industry association · Belgium
Declared costs: €6M+ a year · in the register since 2009
Medicinal products for human use · Standards of quality and safety for substances of human origin intended for human application
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
EFPIA · filed 27 Apr 2021 · source
EFPIA supports an agile regulatory framework and a strong incentives’ system that embrace and encourage advances in science, technology & medicines. This evaluation is an opportunity to implement learnings from COVID-19 and ensure a competitive, world-class regulatory system in Europe supporting a globally competitive research-based industry at a critical time.
Etablissement Français du Sang (French Blood Establishment) · filed 19 Sept 2023 · source
LEtablissement Français du Sang (EFS) thanked the European Commission for its proposal, which met some of the stakeholders’ expectations, but created uncertainty about cross-border products. In particular, we would like to welcome the following points: The reaffirmation of the principle of voluntary and unpaid donation left the harmonisation of the framework for ATMPs prepared under hospital exemption The…
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
EFPIA · filed 3 Oct 2023 · source
EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.
EFPIA · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source
EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.
EFPIA · filed 11 Dec 2020 · source
Revision of the Blood, Tissues & Cells (BTC) Legislation offers an important opportunity to ensure regulatory standards safeguarding patient safety and public health keep pace with technical and scientific advances, legal certainty and risk-based flexibility to facilitate innovation, and sustainability of supplies across EU for both therapeutic need and producing products derived from BTC.
Etablissement Français du Sang (French Blood Establishment) · filed 14 Dec 2020 · source
EFS fully supports the comments provided by the French Ministry of Health. The additional comments presented aim to address in more detail specific issues we identified in our areas of expertise. EFS does not agree with the statement “the lack of […] national monitoring provisions for the supply of BTC makes it difficult to predict EU supply interruptions and to take action to mitigate the risks to patients” when it…
EFPIA · filed 8 Sept 2022 · source
The proposed Substances of Human Origin(SoHO) Regulation intends to harmonize measures for Member States and organizations involved in activities related to SoHOs for human application, facilitating cross-border exchange and continuity of supply in the EU. EFPIA supports these aims but is concerned about areas of the SoHO Regulation that appear incoherent with medicinal product regulation.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.