Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

CCL
Citizens' Climate Lobby Belgium

Environmental organization · Belgium

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
2.3
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2020

Files both filed on (2)

Notification under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) · REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Notification under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)

Citizens' Climate Lobby Belgium · filed 25 Aug 2020 · source

As also indicated in the document, the first thing that needs to be established is to which extent CORSIA, in its current shape, will contribute to the goals of the Paris agreement. It needs to be seriously considered whether CORSIA is a climate policy targeted to solve climate change, or whether it is an attempt to block any effective climate policy for the foreseeable future.

Klimatsvaret - CCL Sverige · filed 28 Aug 2020 · source

Option 1 (“full legal scope for the EU ETS”) is the best of the proposed option. CORSIA does not reduce CO2 emissions at all but only future climate compensation. The damage is already distorted, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased with all the disastrous consequences it will entail. Climate compensation does not prevent these consequences.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

REPowerEU chapters in recovery and resilience plans

Citizens' Climate Lobby Belgium · filed 20 Jul 2022 · source

When developing new policies, consistency with existing policies must be ensured. For the Citizens' Climate Lobby, the Fit For 55 package and the EU climate targets are obviously the most important ones. We want to raise our concerns about the amendment. It is not by demanding consistency in a legal text that this is indeed the case.

Klimatsvaret - CCL Sverige · filed 20 Jul 2022 · source

We are concerned about this proposal, as it sends the wrong signal as to the Union’s determination in the transition to a zero-emission economy. Allowing investment in new fossil energy infrastructure would lead to an inherent conflict of objectives in REPowerEU. The initiative aims to reduce dependence on fossil energy and diversify energy supply.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.