Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
CIROM welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission Inception Impact Assessment for the “Amendment of the EU Emissions Trading System”. CIROM wishes to highlight that the proposed revision of the EU-wide, economy-wide net target for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction - of at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 - will need to be met through actions from all areas of society.
The ETS should remain a core policy instrument to establish CO2 abatement at the lowest practicable cost to society. We do not favor inclusion of other sectors such as transport and buildings as an extension of the ETS current scheme, which already has to cope with different sectors with distinct elasticities, and risks on carbon leakage in one system.
CIROM welcomes the opportunity to comment on the ECs public consultation for the revision of the Annexes V and VI of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED). In view of simplicity and consistency of the legislation RED with Directive EU- ETS 2003/87/EC and Waste Framework Directive, CIROM proposes the insertion of the following recital and new points to the Annex V (bioliquids), part C (Methodology) and Annex VI…
APAG supports the Commissions review of Annexes V and VI and the reliance on the JRCs scientific expertise. At the same time, APAG calls for a clear and explicit limitation of the proposed animal fats pathway values to Category 1 and Category 2 animal fats only; and careful consideration of policy coherence and market impacts when revising GHG accounting rules.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.