Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

AGC
Association of Global Custodians

Industry association · United States

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
1
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €25K+ a year · in the register since 2016

Files both filed on (2)

New EU system for the avoidance of double taxation in the field of withholding taxes · Settlement discipline, cross-border provision of services, supervisory cooperation, provision of banking-type ancillary services and requirements for third-country central securities depositories

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

New EU system for the avoidance of double taxation in the field of withholding taxes

Association of Global Custodians · filed 26 Oct 2021 · source

The Association of Global Custodians welcomes the Commission's initiative to improve withholding tax procedures within the EU. As detailed in the attached letter, we believe a well-functioning relief at source system must be the primary solution (based on standardized documentation, investor self-certification, and electronic data transmission), supplemented by simplified and streamlined reclaim procedures and…

AFME · filed 26 Oct 2021 · source

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to provide its feedback to the European Commission on the “New EU system for the avoidance of double taxation and prevention of tax abuse in the field of withholding taxes”. Our comments on the Inception Impact Assessment have been submitted via a separate document. We would be pleased to assist with this initiative.

AFME · filed 18 Sept 2023 · source

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the European Commissions Proposal for a Council Directive on Faster and Safer Relief of Excess Withholding Taxes (FASTER). AFME strongly supports the Commissions objectives to simplify and digitise withholding tax processes within the EU.

Settlement discipline, cross-border provision of services, supervisory cooperation, provision of banking-type ancillary services and requirements for third-country central securities depositories

AFME · filed 1 Apr 2021 · source

Settlement Discipline Framework AFME believes that changes to the Settlement Discipline Regime (“SDR”) should be considered the key priority of the CSDR Refit. Although the rules have not yet entered into force, there are fundamental issues with their current form. The CSDR Refit presents a perfect opportunity to make targeted amendments to the SDR to ensure its effectiveness from day one.

Association of Global Custodians · filed 26 May 2022 · source

The Association of Global Custodians (AGC) welcomes the European Commission’s Proposal for changes to CSDR. The Commission’s Proposal introduces some important and necessary changes - but it can still be improved in some areas.

AFME · filed 26 May 2022 · source

AFME welcomes that the European Commission proposes that Mandatory Buy-ins (MBI) will not be immediately implemented. As acknowledged in the Commission’s impact assessment, the implementation of a MBI Regime could have a disproportionately negative impact on the liquidity and competitiveness of EU capital markets.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.