Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the call for evidence on the European Commission’s open finance framework initiative. The following comments supplement our response to the Commission’s targeted consultation on 5 July 2022.
With the draft Framework for Financial Data Access (FIDA), the EU Commission aims to facilitate access to customer data for a wide range of financial services. This is intended to promote the exchange of data between companies in the financial sector as a whole. Thus, FIDA sets the regulatory framework for open finance.
Please find attached the comments from ASNEF, the Spanish Finance Houses Association, duly registered in the Transparency Registry with nº 11218815591-29, with regards to the European Commission's proposed Regulation on the Financial Data Access Framework.
We would like to express our concern that the first part of the consultation on Instant Payments (targeted consultation) was published before the end of the deadline for feedback on the Impact Assessment. The SEPA Instant credit transfer ("Instant Payments/ SCT Inst") is an important enrichment of the payments service offering in SEPA, which is well accepted by customers from an actual demand.
Por la presente se adjuntan los comentarios de ASNEF (nº de Registro de Transparencia 11218815591-29) relativos a la propuesta de Reglamento sobre transferencias inmediatas y, en concreto, en relación con los Artículos 5 quáter, apartado 1 y 5 quinquies, apartado 3.
Summary Inadequate scope: In the case of loan agreements of small amounts in themselves above EUR 200, there is, in principle, an extremely high amount of processing costs which is disproportionate to the yield – and this is the case for manageable risks as a whole. Therefore, the revision of the Directive should consider whether the lower limit can be significantly raised.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
“The Spanish Finance Houses Association (ASNEF), the voice of the Spanish specialized consumer credit providers welcomes the opportunity to contribute with it´s comments to the European Commission’s proposal for a Consumer Credit Directive (CCD). Please find enclosed our comments on the Directive proposal.
The German Banking Industry Committee (GBIC) takes this opportunity to express its opinion on the draft proposal of the Consumer Credit Directive (2021/0171) published on 30 June 2021. GBIC shares the goal of the Draft Directive of offering consumers a high level of consumer protection (recital no. 12).
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.