Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ASG
ASGI

NGO · Italy

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
RCE
Red Cross EU Office

Other · Belgium

12
files engaged
of 583 tracked
12
positions filed
in those 583 files
13
declared FTE
self-declared
7
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2014

Files both filed on (2)

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland · Asylum and migration management

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland

ASGI · filed 23 Dec 2021 · source

ASGI considers that the situation at the border with Belarus can be addressed in full compliance with international law and Union law, as currently regulated by the Asylum Directives. The current legal framework, if properly implemented, already provides adequate tools to react to an increase in asylum applications in full respect of the rights of applicants for protection.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Red Cross EU Office · filed 3 Feb 2022 · source

The Red Cross EU Office (RCEU) represents the 27 National Red Cross Societies in the European Union, the Norwegian Red Cross, the Icelandic Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). We hereby wish to share our serious humanitarian concerns on the impact of this proposal on the dignity and rights of migrants in the countries concerned.

Asylum and migration management

Red Cross EU Office · filed 31 Aug 2021 · source

In terms of criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible, the Red Cross EU Office observers that despite the shortcomings of the Dublin system, the Pact does not propose removing the obligation for asylum seekers to remain in the country where their application was first registered.

ASGI · filed 4 Oct 2021 · source

With its proposal for a Regulation on the management of asylum and migration (COM (2020) 610), the Commission introduces into EU law a series of mechanisms and rules designed to establish a common framework for the management of asylum and migration and to establish solidarity mechanisms.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.