Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
APOGEN represents manufacturers of off-patent medicines supplying 63% in retail market and 76% in hospitals of dispensed prescription medicines in Portugal. The pharmaceutical legislation should foster access to follow-on off-patent medicines on day-1 after IP expiry by extending the scope and harmonising the Bolar exemption to cover API supply and all administrative steps needed to effectively launch…
EFPIA supports an agile regulatory framework and a strong incentives’ system that embrace and encourage advances in science, technology & medicines. This evaluation is an opportunity to implement learnings from COVID-19 and ensure a competitive, world-class regulatory system in Europe supporting a globally competitive research-based industry at a critical time.
APOGEN, Portuguese Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association represents the companies of generic and biosimilar medicines in Portugal, welcomes the proposals to review the EU general pharmaceutical legislation.
APOGEN, Portuguese Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association represents the companies of generic and biosimilar medicines in Portugal, welcomes the proposals to review the EU general pharmaceutical legislation.
EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.
EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.
Bringing new therapies to patients is a long, complex and risky process that requires long-term and continuous investments. Patents are critical to that purpose and to the EU’s innovation and industrial ambitions.
APOGEN welcomes the chance to provide feedback on the proposal to reduce fragmentation in the SPC system. The Call for Evidence (CfE) makes almost no reference to a need to tackle fragmentation in enforcement/litigation phase of SPC lifecycles, arguably the highest priority for ensuring timely patient access to generic/biosimilar medicines, legal certainty & address national budget issues, ignoring the core problem…
EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.
EFPIA supports the stated aims for the SPC revisions. Central SPC issuance for classical European patents and Unitary Patents will improve IP framework efficiency, bringing innovative medicines to patients in a timely manner via reliable protection.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.