Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
EFP
EFPIA

Industry association · Belgium

35
files engaged
of 583 tracked
49
positions filed
in those 583 files
13.4
declared FTE
self-declared
13
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €6M+ a year · in the register since 2009

Files both filed on (2)

Medicinal products for human use · Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Medicinal products for human use

Access to Medicines Ireland · filed 26 Apr 2021 · source

Access to Medicines Ireland (AMI) welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the revision of the general pharmaceutical legislation. We have comments, and recommendations in the following areas: Unmet Need 1. Towards a definition of ‘unmet need’, we recommend developing a fair, equitable and transparent decision-making process for what is an ‘unmet need’. 2.

EFPIA · filed 27 Apr 2021 · source

EFPIA supports an agile regulatory framework and a strong incentives’ system that embrace and encourage advances in science, technology & medicines. This evaluation is an opportunity to implement learnings from COVID-19 and ensure a competitive, world-class regulatory system in Europe supporting a globally competitive research-based industry at a critical time.

EFPIA · filed 3 Oct 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.

EFPIA · filed 9 Oct 2023 · source

EFPIA supports the objectives of enhancing the availability and accessibility of medicines, while fostering a competitive innovation environment in Europe. We welcome the proposal to future-proof the EU regulatory framework, maximising the use of expedited pathways, optimising regulatory decision-making processes, and reducing unnecessary administrative burdens.

Compulsory licensing of patents in crisis situations

EFPIA · filed 28 Apr 2022 · source

The substantial investment in R&D by multiple actors over many years into novel technologies, vaccine, therapeutic and other products now available to address Covid-19 would not have occurred without the robust IP system in the EU and elsewhere. IP protections, particularly patents, has provided the legal framework and incentive for the high risk, high-cost investment underpinning the response to the pandemic.

Access to Medicines Ireland · filed 29 Apr 2022 · source

Compulsory Licensing in the EU: Call for Evidence Submission by Access to Medicines Ireland (AMI) 29 April 2022 [max 4000 characters] AMI is a voluntary membership group of Cómhlamh, and we welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the EU’s proposal to review the compulsory licensing in Europe.

EFPIA · filed 28 Jul 2023 · source

In its Compulsory Licensing (CL) proposal, the European Commission (EC) posits a new EU-wide CL for crisis response. This harms IP rights and is a dramatic expansion of the ECs role into Member State (MS) remit, where viable CL provisions already exist. CLs are a last resort, all attempts at voluntary licensing having failed.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.