ASERCOM is not supporting the proposed phase down. We think the phase down is a phase out and not phase down. The proposed phase down is unconsistent due to : Only quota for maintenance and service [EPEE HFC model] The number of units in general are increasing : Datacenters/Heat pumps/Air con. High uncertainty based on regulations which are not synchronised.
ASE
ASERCOM
Company · Belgium
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track ASERCOM in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ASERCOM? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ASERCOM filed 3 positions between 7 Sept 2020 and 10 Jun 2024, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
We as ASERCOM, the Association of European Refrigeration Component Manufacturers, reaffirmed in 2018* our commitment and engagement to accompany our industry to reach the 2030 F-gas target of CO2 emission réductions: 1.- Containment & Safety Measures: Our industry has always led standardization committees and followed standards concerning tightness of components and safety requirements.
ASERCOM welcomes the opportunity to give feedback on establishing minimum requirements for the issuance of certificates to natural and legal persons and the conditions for the mutual recognition of such certificates pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/573.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put ASERCOM next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 12.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ASERCOM’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.