Flexibility, technology readiness and investment cycles Achieving the 2040 target requires flexible and cost efficient implementation mechanisms that reflect technology readiness levels, industrial investment cycles and infrastructure constraints. Linear reduction pathways risk forcing premature deployment of immature technologies (e.g. large scale hydrogen use) that are not yet available or economically viable.
ANO
Anonimous
Company · Romania
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Anonimous in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Anonimous? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Anonimous filed 2 positions on 20 Feb 2026, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Avoid implicit transfer of LULUCF underperformance to industry The 2040 climate target must ensure that shortfalls in natural carbon removals (LULUCF) do not translate into stricter or unrealistic emission reduction obligations for industry.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Anonimous’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.