Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
AV

Agora Verkehrswende

Academic / research · Austria · EU Transparency Register 447579528197-45not in register snapshot

identity not settledMore than one register entry could match this filer, so we have not linked it to any of them. The filings shown are those under this exact name.

This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 2 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Agora in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Agora Verkehrswende? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Agora Verkehrswende engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Agora Verkehrswende or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Agora Verkehrswende filed 2 positions between 4 May 2020 and 26 Nov 2020, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.

What they argued

CO2 emission standards for cars and vansfiled 26 Nov 2020source

Agora Verkehrswende appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback at the beginning of this process. Generally, as electrification progresses, it would be more suitable to base the standards on energy efficiency rather than CO2 emissions in order to address the imbalance between electric and combustion cars, to ensure that all vehicle types improve over time, and also because a shrinking share of new vehicles will…

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructurefiled 4 May 2020source

We agree with the choice of the four problems identified in the inception Impact Assessment and the way they are to be tackled. We would however point out a fifth line of enquiry which concerns the range of fuels covered by the Directive.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Agora Verkehrswende next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 46.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Agora Verkehrswende’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.