Common format for initial and updated National Air Pollution Control Programmes
1 submissions from 1 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
Who showed up
0 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations; 1 from public authorities, academia and others.
Industry 0Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 1
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations: a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation is open: 1 day leftto submit. It closes on 21 Oct 2026.
Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.
Policy area
Sustainability (DG ENV)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2026
How it got here
Dec impl draft21 Oct 2026 · upcoming
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Dec impl.
1. PaM tool and potential duplication of reporting requirements We would appreciate clarification on the procedure to be followed if the PaM tool or the automatic data import functionality is not fully operational by the time the revised NAPCP format becomes mandatory.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed”. You read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.