Other · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 996789025151-11
2
positions filed
in the 655 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 655 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 655 consultation files tracked so far (56,999 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 64 academic institutions on this site, they rank #41 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
4.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
UNICA - https://www.unica-network.eu/
UniLion - https://www.unilion.eu/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Sept 2026).
Register category
Academic institutions
Head office
Brussel, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Vrije Universiteit Brussel? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Vrije Universiteit Brussel filed 2 positions between 19 Jul 2021 and 16 Sept 2026, across 2 of the 655 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
The proposal for an EU AI Act of 21 April 2021 Hildebrandt commentary 19 July 2021 Ref. Ares(2021)4651780 - 19/07/2021 A brief commentary by Mireille Hildebrandt 1 The Architecture of the AIA 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Terminology 2 2 Issues 3 2.1 Prohibited practices 3 2.2 High risk systems 4 2.3 Transparency obligations for certain AI systems 6 2.4 Harmonisation 6 3 Enforcement, remedies, individual rights, oversight…
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
The key issues of the EIT and its KICs in terms of financial inefficiency, overly complex governance and administrative burden (for members, partners and participants), lack of transparency, overlaps and duplication with other instruments are well identified in this consultation and documented by other bodies (e.g. European Court of Auditors reports).
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Vrije Universiteit Brussel next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Vrije Universiteit Brussel’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.
