I'm writing to express disagreement and huge concern on the White Paper "on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential". This disagreement applies to both the corrent funding framework program Horizon Europe and to the next Framework Program 10.
USB
Trade union · Italy
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track USB in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at USB? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
USB filed 2 positions on 30 Apr 2024, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
I am writing to express my disagreement on the White Paper 'On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential'. I totally disagree to allow for more dual-use technology within the current funding framework programme, Horizon Europe, and its successor programme, Framework Programme 10 (FP10). More Europe have to enforce the international act against genocide.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from USB’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.