Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Options for support for R&D of dual-use technologies

108 submissions from 100 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 241 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 108 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

25 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 12 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 2.1 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 25Civil society 12Public authorities, academia, other 71

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

31 of 100
in the EU Register
197
full-time lobbying staff
€16.9M+
declared costs a year
81
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 30 Apr 2024 — it ran from 25 Jan 2024.

Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Commission reference
COM(2024)27

How it got here

  1. Paper white30 Apr 2024

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

108 positions · showing 25

TD

TU Dellft

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

Currently challenging at the level of individual researchers is the identification of what falls under dual-use, such as is the case for certain AI systems and applications. Indeed, as the white paper states, this is connected with the definition of dual-use and also with assessing the potential at the present moment but also assessing future potential dual-uses.

LinkedInX
CE

Civil Engagement Group - Senate of Ireland

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

I am submitting feedback in the attached file on behalf of the Civil Engagement Group of the Senate of Ireland. The Civil Engagement Group is a technical group of progessive Senators. Senator Higgins and Senator Ruane are both university Senators -- elected by graduates of the National University of Ireland and the University of Dublin respectively.

LinkedInX
UC

University College Cork

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

Dear Sir/ Madam, Please, these are troubling times wherein we can feel rushed to make decisions rashly that feel imperative. My colleagues and I who have considered the matter find this to be at best an awful, frightening mistake.

LinkedInX
N

NTNU

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the White Paper on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential. As a university with a main profile in technology and natural sciences, NTNU acknowledges the importance of the White Paper, and herby attach our input.

LinkedInX
TL

The Labour Party in Ireland

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

The Labour Party is opposed to changes to Horizon Europe and FP10 that would lead to increased dual use research for military purposes. The European Union should be focused on civil applications from scientific research. We are concerned at the increasing militarisation of the European Union and endorse keeping the funds separate.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Rome Tor Vergata

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

In the attached file, you can find the names of the signatories of this letter. To Whom It May Concern: The following text is drafted to express our personal opinion regarding the ongoing amendments to the White Paper, which redefine the paradigms of development and use of dual-use technologies within the Horizon Europe program and its successor, Framework Programme 10 (FP10).

LinkedInX
U

USB

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

I'm writing to express disagreement and huge concern on the White Paper "on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential". This disagreement applies to both the corrent funding framework program Horizon Europe and to the next Framework Program 10.

LinkedInX
EW

European Women's Lobby

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

In the context of this consultation, the European Womens Lobby (EWL) wishes to express its concern on the tendency of the EU to move towards a military/security approach. The EWL highlights that UN Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security will mark its 25th anniversary in 2025. This Resolution acknowledges that women are agents of peace and reconciliation.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Limerick (Ireland)

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

As an academic and docent in European Studies, I strongly oppose any proposal that further opens Horizon Europe funds to military applications, even under the guise of dual-use. All three paths proposed in the white paper deviate from the proclaimed European Union values and goals.

LinkedInX
U

UCD

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

University College Dublin [email removed] 30 April 2024 Subject: Consultation Response on White Paper 'On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential' To Whom It May Concern: The direct consequence of the proposed so-called Dual Use R&I funding, if adopted, would be to establish a new ethical basis for the EU.

LinkedInX
UO

University of Galway

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

Im writing as a former ERC award-holder and as current Chair of the Irish Humanities Alliance. I am opposed to the proposal to extend dual-use funding within the current Horizon Europe programme and its successors. I believe that these programmes should be confined to civil applications.

LinkedInX
UC

University College Cork

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

I am Elaine O'Mahony, an admin assistant in University College Cork. I am writing to provide feedback on the European Commission's White Paper, "On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential." I am hugely concerned about the proposal to allow dual use technologies within the funding programmes, such as Horizon Europe and PF10.

LinkedInX
SF

Sinn Féin

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

We, the undersigned would like to outline our concerns regarding the contents of the EU White Paper On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual use potential. Ireland is proud of its long standing position of being a militarily neutral country.

LinkedInX
SR

Swedish Research Council

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

See attachment for full statement from the Swedish Research Council (SRC). Below is a short summary. The opinion of the SRC is based on the understanding that excellent research and innovation, which is crucial for the EUs competitiveness and success, depends on certain inherent principles such as academic freedom, open science, and international collaboration.

LinkedInX
OO

office of Grace O Sullivan MEP

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

To Whom It May Concern I am writing to express my views on the White Paper - 'On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential'. I have a number of concerns regarding the proposed adjustments to permit more dual-use technology within the current funding framework programme, Horizon Europe, and its successor programme, the Framework Programme 10 (FP10).

LinkedInX
SE

SIS EGIZ

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

We believe that the concept of dual-use can only be applied at higher TRL levels, and we therefore propose that resources for basic and applied research should be enriched with resources dedicated to dual-use research only. This will help us achieve useful results more quickly.

Filed in Slovenian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
EE

EDRIN - European Defence Research and Innovation Network

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

EDRIN, as the leading group of RTOs involved in defence industry, welcomed with interest the White paper about the dual-use technologies and the possible options to strengthen the support to R&D in the field of potential dual-use technologies. After a thorough analysis of the three proposed options, EDRIN would discard the option 3.

LinkedInX
AO

Association of European Research Establishments in Aeronautics (EREA)

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

EREA, the association of European Research Establishments in Aeronautics welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the European Commission's White Paper On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential. The attached feedback provides the considerations of EREA members on the options described in the European Commissions White Paper.

LinkedInX
U

USB

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

I am writing to express my disagreement on the White Paper 'On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential'. I totally disagree to allow for more dual-use technology within the current funding framework programme, Horizon Europe, and its successor programme, Framework Programme 10 (FP10). More Europe have to enforce the international act against genocide.

LinkedInX
PD

Politecnico di Torino

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

I am writing this letter as a researcher on material and mechanics related topics. I am strongly involved in the applications of the results of the research I, and my research group, deal with. I am writing this letter following the discussion on White Paper On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential We strongly ask to amend the discussed document for…

LinkedInX
NH

Netherlands House for Education and Research

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

Further debate is necessary Neth-ER believes in general that the White Paper doesnt provide enough information to make an conclusive choice about the given options. Further discussion and conversation on the topic of dual use in the Framework Programme (FP) is highly needed, and should be held together with all relevant stakeholders of Horizon Europe.

LinkedInX
MO

Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation (Slovenia)

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

The Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Innovation (Slovenia) welcomes the efforts of the European Commission in finding synergies and optimizing various types of EU support intended to encourage and strengthen research and development of technologies with dual-use potential.

LinkedInX
CC

CEA - Commissariat à l'énergie atomique

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

The CEA, a major player in civil and military research and technology transfer, is closely considering any developments in the regulatory framework for dual technologies. Faced with the Commission’s findings, the EAA welcomed with great interest its White Paper on options for strengthening support for research and development in the field of potential dual use technologies.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
E

EARTO

· · filed 30 Apr 2024 · source

PDF

EARTO Answer to EC Consultation on Technologies with Dual-use Potential - 30 April 2024 The European Commission (EC) published on 24 January 2024 a White Paper on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential. EARTO welcomes the increased attention for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 108 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.