I agree, that the Chips Act is intended to ensure the EUs resilience and technological sovereignty in semiconductor technologies and applications. And at the same time Chips Act should focus on on bouth objectives: reducing the EUs dependency on other parts of the world for leading-edge chips, notably by increasing the EUs manufacturing capacity in advanced semiconductors for critical sectors; and · increasing…
University of Tartu
Academic / research · Estonia · EU Transparency Register 2906244100503-90
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 655 consultation files tracked so far (56,999 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 64 academic institutions on this site, they rank #40 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- The Guild
- EUA
- Enlight jt on loetletud siin: https://ut.ee/en/content/networks
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Academic institutions
- Head office
- Tartu, Estonia
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at University of Tartu? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
University of Tartu filed 2 positions between 28 Nov 2025 and 23 Sept 2026, across 2 of the 655 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
EIT call for evicence 2026 – University of Tartu (UT) responses 1. Do you agree with the main problems and challenges identified, including the need to strengthen Europe’s competitiveness through more effective innovation ecosystems, stronger knowledge-triangle integration and better translation of knowledge into market impact?
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put University of Tartu next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from University of Tartu’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.