Dear Sirs, Here I am providing some bullet points with my input concerning the Critical Raw Materials Act. 1) The procurement of CRMs from extra-EU suppliers should not be negotiated at the level of single Member State (or even worse, at the level of single company) but by the EU as a whole. 2) Every possible effort must be dedicated to foster the recycling of CRMs, providing suitable incentives.
UP
University of Padova
Academic / research · Italy
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
5
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at University of Padova? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
University of Padova filed 5 positions between 28 Oct 2022 and 8 Jan 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
2022 · 1 filed2025 · 3 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
As a university professor working in analogue and RF integrated circuit design, I rely daily on the availability of advanced design tools, fabrication technologies, and prototyping services to carry out high-quality research and to provide meaningful training to my students.
The Call for Evidence for the Advanced Materials Act is a timely and well-structured initiative that clearly articulates both the strategic relevance of advanced materials and the urgency of accelerating their development, scale-up, and uptake in the EU.
I strongly support the European Commissions commitment to reinforce the future of the European Sport Model, in particular its pyramid structure. A model based on solidarity, promotion and relegation, together with the autonomy of sport is essential to fairness, integrity and equal access across Europe.
As a CAS arbitrator and lawyer, I strongly support the European Commissions commitment to reinforce the future of the European Sport Model, in particular its pyramid structure. A model based on solidarity, promotion and relegation, together with the autonomy of sport is essential to fairness, integrity and equal access across Europe.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put University of Padova next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 42.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from University of Padova’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.