SNCB remains firmly committed to protecting passenger rights and ensuring a seamless travel experience. However, we have serious concerns regarding the European Commissions proposal to extend the legal obligation of through-tickets, particularly in relation to two key aspects: 1.
SNCB
Company · Belgium
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track SNCB in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at SNCB? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
SNCB filed 2 positions between 14 Mar 2025 and 22 Sept 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
The European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) published recommendations for the TAF/TAP TSI in January 2022 after four years of work, based on the TSI revision mandate (Decision 2017/1474). An initial interim revision was incorporated into the TAP TSI in 2021.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SNCB’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.