Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SKO

Skogforsk

Academic / research · Sweden

2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Skogforsk in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Skogforsk? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Skogforsk engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Skogforsk or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Skogforsk filed 2 positions between 18 Feb 2022 and 5 May 2022, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Road vehicles: maximum weights and dimensionsfiled 18 Feb 2022PDFsource

Skogforsk welcomes the initiative to revise the Directive 96/53/EC on maximum permissible weights and dimensions for heavy-duty vehicles. The reason is that Skogforsk for a long time have done research and development in the direction of High Capacity Transport (HCT) with the aim of reducing the environmental footprint that forestry transport provides.

Monitoring framework for resilient European forestsfiled 5 May 2022source

Skogforsk provides the following comments on the proposal for a new EU forest monitoring framework and strategic forest plans 1.Skogforsk acknowledges that the coordination of forest data can be useful in order to ensure consistency and clarity in European statistics. However, remote monitoring does not need to be the only approach.

Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Skogforsk’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.