RUSAL’s input to the European Commission’s public consultation Environmental performance of products & businesses – substantiating claims 1. Expression of support to the EC’s work on the societal ambition to address climate urgency: A common approach to declaring environmental performance of actors in the European market is key to facilitate the removal of barriers to net-zero ambition.
Rusal
Company · RUS · EU Transparency Register 515755333081-70not in register snapshot
This register number is the organization’s own declaration on its submission. It is not in the 14 Sept 2026 snapshot of the EU Transparency Register, so we neither link to it nor use it to identify this organization.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Rusal in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Rusal? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Rusal filed 3 positions between 1 Apr 2020 and 12 Nov 2021, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
What they argued
As a key EU aluminium industry player RUSAL maintains its position expressed within previous consultations on the CBAM as RUSAL still sees no rationale behind the decision to include primary aluminium (PA) into the scope of the CBAM.
UC Rusal is the 3rd largest global primary aluminium (PA) producer. Rusal meets 20 % of the EU growing PA demand 75 % of which is imported. Rusal’s PA and PA alloys are subject to the EU import duties of 3-6 %. Aluminium sector with 1.1 Gt CO₂ e accounts for 2 % of global anthropogenic emissions. Rusal measures carbon footprint of its operations and supports industry-wide decarbonisation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Rusal next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 45.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Rusal’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.