Article 72 of the Directive should contain a specific provision allowing the allocation of intellectual property rights to be modified during contract performance without being regarded as an unlawful modification or an undue advantage. The objective of contracting authorities is not to accumulate intellectual property that they do not require.
RLF
RASK Law Firm
Company · Estonia
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track RASK in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at RASK Law Firm? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
RASK Law Firm filed 3 positions between 1 Oct 2025 and 2 Oct 2025, across 1 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
The notion of intellectual property is very broad and, if used without clarification, can create significant uncertainty in practice. Regulation should explicitly define whether, and in which circumstances, reference is made to copyright (for example software, databases or documents), inventions and patentable solutions, utility models, design rights, trademarks, trade names or confidential know-how.
One of the objectives of the Innovation Act is movement within Europe, both in terms of cooperation and dissemination. The outcomes of creating innovative solutions can be very broad, ranging from science and education to defense and security goods. However, today at the European level, cross-border movement of many goods, including between Member States, is highly over- or under-regulated.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put RASK Law Firm next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from RASK Law Firm’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.