Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PSA

PSA

Company · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 716869419341-75

2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #726 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€25K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Companies & groups
Registered as
PSA Antwerp (PSAA)
Head office
Antwerpen, Belgium

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track PSA in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow PSA

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at PSA? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

PSA filed 2 positions between 23 Oct 2025 and 13 Aug 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

EU Emissions Trading System - update of neighbouring container transhipment portsfiled 13 Aug 2026PDFsource

PSA acknowledges the European Commissions efforts to take the concerns of private port terminal operators into account in its review of ETS Maritime. Specifically, PSA appreciates the measures and adjustments the Commission has made to prevent so-called carbon leakage, best defined as the loss of business for EU ports caused by shipping lines redirecting transshipment volumes to non-EU ports to avoid ETS duties.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put PSA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from PSA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.