Pro Wildlife welcomes the European Commissions initiative to revise the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the EUs cornerstone for protecting the marine environment. The Commissions 2025 evaluation confirmed that the MSFD provides a solid framework for an ecosystem-based approach, but also showed that the lack of clear mandatory measures contributed to Member States failing to achieve Good Environmental…
PW
Pro Wildlife
NGO · Germany · EU Transparency Register 285805825014-46
4
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
4
legislative files
of 665 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1106 non-governmental organisations on this site, they rank #362 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.8
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2016
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Species Survival Network (www.ssn.org)
- Deutscher Naturschutzring (www.dnr.de)
- United for Wildlife https://unitedforwildlife.org/taskforce-members/
- International Alliance against Health Risks in Wildlife Trade (https://alliance-health-wildlife.org/)
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Non-governmental organisations
- Head office
- Muenchen, Germany
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Pro in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Pro Wildlife? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Pro Wildlife filed 4 positions between 23 Feb 2022 and 6 Jul 2026, across 4 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.
2022 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed2026 · 2 filed
What they argued
1. Science-based Total Allowable Catches (TACs): The setting of Total Allowable Catches (TACs) must be based exclusively on the best available scientific advice, in particular assessments provided by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).
Pro Wildlife welcomes the Commission’s proposal to revise the Directive. We agree with the EU Commission’s analysis of existing problems; however, we recommend several steps for further improvement of the Directive. As Pro Wildlife’s focus is wildlife trade and wildlife crime our feedback below is limited to this aspect of environmental crime.
This is a joint response from Pro Wildlife and Sharkproject. We congratulate the EU and its Member States on the progress made so far in reducing overfishing. However, we also believe that much more needs to be done and therefore welcome the opportunity to make a submission to this consultation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Pro Wildlife next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 18.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Pro Wildlife’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.