Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PT

Politecnico di Torino

Academic / research · Italy · EU Transparency Register 957604517912-74

10
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
7
legislative files
of 665 tracked
5
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Who they are

Among the 66 academic institutions on this site, they rank #3 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.

4.6
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
5
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since

Declares membership of

  • https://www.polito.it/en/research/research-funding/european-partnerships-and-research-networks
  • Adra - AI, Data and Robotics Association
  • JU CLEAN AVIATION
  • CHIPS JU
  • EERA – EUROPEAN ENERGY RESEARCH ALLIANCE →
  • ETP-EUMAT: European Technology Platform for Advanced Engineering Materials and Technologies
  • EFFRA- European Factory of the Future Research Association
  • EGVIA A.I.S.B.L - The European Green Vehicles Initiative Association
  • ELGIP - European Large Geotechnical Institutes Platform
  • EPIC – European Photonics Industry Consortium
  • ERIC aisbl – European Research Institute of Catalysis
  • HPC Advisory Council
  • and 17 more

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).

Register category
Academic institutions
Head office
TORINO, Italy

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.

Track Politecnico in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow Politecnico di Torino

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at Politecnico di Torino? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

Politecnico di Torino filed 10 positions between 30 Apr 2024 and 23 Sept 2026, across 7 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 5 times.

2024 · 1 filed2025 · 4 filed2026 · 5 filed

What they argued

Chips Act 2.0filed 27 Nov 2025source

The European Union, through the European Chips Act, aims to strengthen domestic semiconductor production capacity, but real sovereignty in an industrial sector is achieved through supremacy and control over design.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Chips Act 2.0filed 26 Nov 2025source

Great idea, but as usual the money is wasted by distributing it mostly to tons of small companies that exist only to suck up EU money, big companies that exist only to employ Europeans and kick the can around, plus the few usual suspects in academia. And Italy pays Italian partners years after the project has started, sometimes even years after the project has ended.

Chips Act 2.0filed 19 Nov 2025source

I have been working in the field of digital integrated circuits since 1999. Much of the work carried out by myself and by my research group has been possible thanks to the Europractice initiative, which has provided access to professional design tools and semiconductor technologies. More recently, with support from the PNRR and CHIPS-IT, we successfully completed a RISC-Vbased tapeout in October 2025.

Chips Act 2.0filed 19 Nov 2025source

The effort of Chips Act 2 should focus not only on semiconductor production capability but also on reinvigorating the design capability. This requires an effort towards younger generations (high-schoolers and below) to promote the profession of integrated circuit (IC) designer so that they enroll in the right courses at university level and learn how to design a chip.

Advanced Materials Actfiled 5 Jan 2026source

Based on my experience in research and innovation on advanced materials, I would like to highlight several priority areas: 1) Strengthening EU Academic Institution: Based on my academic experience, I would suggest as a priority to reinforce the operational capacity of EU academic institutions, which are increasingly affected by recurring funding cuts.

Revision of the EIT Regulation and of the Strategic Innovation Agendafiled 23 Sept 2026PDFsource

Europe has strong scientific and technological capabilities, but these do not always translate rapidly enough into innovation and market impact. The challenge is therefore not only to generate excellent research and technologies, but also to better connect capabilities and resources already available across Europe.

A water resilience research and innovation strategyfiled 31 Jul 2026PDFsource

Politecnico di Torino welcomes the initiative and its source-to-sea integration with the Ocean strategy. We also share the diagnosis: the problem is less a shortage of solutions than the fragmentation of EU water R&I and the gap between pilot and deployment. See details in the attached file.

European ocean research and innovation strategyfiled 31 Jul 2026PDFsource

Politecnico di Torino welcomes the European Commissions initiative to develop an integrated European Ocean and Water Research and Innovation Strategy. From the perspective of marine renewable energy and offshore testing infrastructures, the contribution identifies six priorities to reduce fragmentation, strengthen implementation capacity and accelerate the transition from research to industrial deployment.

Options for support for R&D of dual-use technologiesfiled 30 Apr 2024PDFsource

I am writing this letter as a researcher on material and mechanics related topics. I am strongly involved in the applications of the results of the research I, and my research group, deal with. I am writing this letter following the discussion on White Paper On options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential We strongly ask to amend the discussed document for…

10th report on economic, social and territorial cohesionfiled 2 Jul 2026PDFsource

The MFF proposal fails to adequately recognise the essential role of cities and local communities. Furthermore, the introduction of National and Regional Partnership Plans risks becoming, in some Member States, a mechanism for further centralising decision-making at the expense of local authorities.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Politecnico di Torino next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 74.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Politecnico di Torino’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.