Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
We propose to add as an evaluation criterion an assessment of the state of Europe’s connectivity in the area of debarrierisation measures and regulations in individual countries and their implementation vis-à-vis EU regulations.
Filed in Slovak · English published by the European Commission
We propose to add accessibility and accessibility in relation to connecting EU countries as an evaluation criterion, as well as to assess the state of domestic legislation against EU measures and regulations in each country. Furthermore, we propose to compare the difference in proportion in the content of the evaluation material up to 2020 (for connecting Europe).
Filed in Slovak · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from OZ Bez bariéry - Národná platforma proti bariéram’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.