The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) highly values the opportunity to contribute to this consultation on such a crucial topic for Europes future. With a main profile in technology and natural sciences, NTNU considers this process particularly important for strengthening Europes innovation capacity, competitiveness, and sustainability.
NTNU
Academic / research · Norway · EU Transparency Register 886395221039-89
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 44 academic institutions on this site, they rank #16 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Declares membership of
- As a public University
- we are members of several associations even active in the Brussels context. Among them
- we can mention:
- EUA - European Universities Association
- CESAER →
- ScienceBusiness
- EERA - European Energy Research Alliance →
- ECTP - European Construction Technology Platform
- EFFRA - European Factories of the Future Research Alliance
- IAM-I - Innovative Advanced Materials Initiative
- UnILiON -Universities Informal Liaison Offices Network
- EOREA - European Ocean Research and Education Alliance
- and 3 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
- Register category
- Academic institutions
- Registered as
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
- Head office
- Trondheim, Norway
- EU office
- Bruxelles
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track NTNU in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at NTNU? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
NTNU filed 3 positions between 30 Apr 2024 and 3 Oct 2025, across 3 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
Dear committee, I am an early-career scientist in a biomedical field. During my projects, I used a sustainable, animal-free product to culture my model. However, the company has recently decided to discontinue the entire product line, citing increased regulatory burden and slow market adoption. My request is simple: please lower the regulatory burden.
The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) appreciates the opportunity to provide input on the White Paper on options for enhancing support for research and development involving technologies with dual-use potential. As a university with a main profile in technology and natural sciences, NTNU acknowledges the importance of the White Paper, and herby attach our input.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 3 files in common
- Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) · 3 files in common
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland · 3 files in common
- Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres · 3 files in common
- EARTO · 3 files in common
Showing 5 of 38.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from NTNU’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.