Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
NG

Neova Group

Company · Finland

3
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 639 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Neova in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Neova Group? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Neova Group engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 3 files, from Neova Group or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Neova Group filed 3 positions between 8 Nov 2021 and 15 Nov 2021, across 3 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.

What they argued

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanismfiled 15 Nov 2021PDFsource

Neova Group welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and sees the proposed mechanism as a necessary tool in preventing the very real risk of carbon leakage. Neova argues that activated carbon should be subjected to carbon pricing via CBAM. Activated carbon is used in air and water purification and in industry it is used to treat waste waters and flue gases.

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transportfiled 8 Nov 2021PDFsource

Neova Group would like to bring to the Commission’s attention the issue of activated carbon, that is used in air and water purification. Activated carbon production is exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage, as most of world’s activated carbon is made outside the EU using coal. Importing coal based activated carbon seriously undermines the goals of the European Green Deal.

Land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)filed 8 Nov 2021PDFsource

Neova Group supports the Commission’s ambitious climate policy and actions towards a more sustainable future where local products would be promoted, biodiversity would be enhanced, and pollution would be minimised. Regarding the LULUCF regulation, Neova Group argues that the role of horticultural peat should be understood from a holistic perspective and regulation should not be overly burdensome.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Neova Group next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 133.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Neova Group’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.