not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
We believe that carrying out the following activities in the digitalisation process can make a significant contribution to improving the performance of public water operators: 1. Infrastructure connection of critical facilities a. Building its own secure communication network between all critical infrastructure facilities 2. Implementation of an asset management system (Asset management) a.
Filed in Croatian · English published by the European Commission
I strongly welcome this evaluation. I am a long-standing national data provider/reporter, mainly in climate change mitigation but also supporting areas such as air pollution. I selected a random country because I do not want to be identifiable. EEA and Eionet add value through quality-checked, comparable European data.
There is too little awareness of the European Heritage Label among European Commission officials and MEPs, who are therefore unable to promote it, particularly when they travel to the various EU countries. The quota reducing the possibility of labelling to 1 sites per country every 2 years should be increased to allow for greater awareness of the label among European citizens.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Ministry next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Ministry’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.