Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
LLA

Lace Lithography AS

Company · Norway

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 639 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Lace in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Lace Lithography AS? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Lace Lithography AS engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Lace Lithography AS or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Lace Lithography AS filed 2 positions between 27 Nov 2025 and 2 Sept 2026, across 1 of the 639 legislative files tracked here.

2025 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed

What they argued

Chips Act 2.0filed 2 Sept 2026source

Lace Lithography AS welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed Regulation COM(2026) 504. EUV lithography today depends on a single global supplier. Chips Act 2.0 rightly recognises equipment explicitly as part of the supply and value chain , but building more fabs in the Union does not fix this single point of failure if those fabs keep depending on the same source for their machinery: there is no…

Chips Act 2.0filed 27 Nov 2025source

The Chips Act I was primarily focused on new devices and downstream applications, utilizing equipment from established suppliers and traditional manufacturing technologies to enable it. This left a gap in the Chips Act I, where companies that create new chip manufacturing and metrology equipment were essentially left out.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Lace Lithography AS next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Lace Lithography AS’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.