As pointed out in the call for evidence there are different issues related to the innovation ecosystem, like access to finance, to talent or to infrastructures and markets. Our response focuses on the limited access to research and technology infrastructures supporting innovative companies in developing and testing their innovations.
KAN
ÅKP AS Nowegian catapult Digital
Other · Norway
2
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 326 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track ÅKP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at ÅKP AS Nowegian catapult Digital? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
ÅKP AS Nowegian catapult Digital filed 2 positions between 22 May 2025 and 18 Sept 2025, across 2 of the 326 legislative files tracked here.
What they argued
Subject: Importance of Technology Infrastructures and the Role of Norwegian Catapult Digital for SMEs. We appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the "Call for Evidence" regarding the European strategy on research and technology infrastructures.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
- German Association of Biotechnology Industries (DIB) within the German Chemical Industry Association - VCI · 2 files in common
- Eurogroup for Animals · 2 files in common
- ACT | The App Association · 2 files in common
- Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA) · 2 files in common
- Global3CCS · 2 files in common
Showing 5 of 27.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from ÅKP AS Nowegian catapult Digital’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.