Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
KIN

Kino

Company · Germany

3
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 326 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Kino in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Kino? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the file Kino engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on this file, from Kino or from anyone else on it. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Kino filed 3 positions between 7 Mar 2025 and 11 Mar 2025, across 1 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

What they argued

Evaluation of the Geo-blocking Regulationfiled 11 Mar 2025source

The preservation of geo-blocking is central to the European film and media industry. The whole value chain, from manufacturing to exploitation, benefits from the principle of territoriality. If geo-blocking were lifted, this principle would become obsolete. Geo-blocking thus guarantees the functioning of the film industry.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Evaluation of the Geo-blocking Regulationfiled 7 Mar 2025PDFsource

Maintaining geo-blocking is synonymous with the preservation of the film and media industry in Europe. The whole value chain, from film production to exploitation, benefits from the territoriality principle, which would be lost if geo-blocking was lifted. Geo-blocking is almost life insurance for a functioning film industry.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Evaluation of the Geo-blocking Regulationfiled 7 Mar 2025source

Geo-blocking in the audiovisual sector protects important interests of the film and creative sectors. First, it allows for territorial licensing that ensures staggered financing of productions. Without geo-blocking, large streaming services such as Netflix or Disney+ could buy the rights at a lower price across the EU, putting smaller productions at risk.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Kino’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.